<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 California Election Propositions: Prop 19 &#8211; 27</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenewsoftoday.com/2010-california-election-propositions-prop-19-27/4517/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenewsoftoday.com/2010-california-election-propositions-prop-19-27/4517/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thenewsoftoday.com/2010-california-election-propositions-prop-19-27/4517/#comment-11450</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewsoftoday.com/?p=4517#comment-11450</guid>
		<description>No links in the article to candidates&#039; pages. 

No links to further explication of the propositions. 

Not even two sentences to clarify each side&#039;s allegations about the ballot measures they push or oppose.

Generally a waste of readers&#039; time, a space-filler, and a pseudo-page created as a place to put ads. 

But I seriously thank you for not using it as a vehicle to push either party&#039;s one-sided agenda. That is laudable. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No links in the article to candidates&#8217; pages. </p>
<p>No links to further explication of the propositions. </p>
<p>Not even two sentences to clarify each side&#8217;s allegations about the ballot measures they push or oppose.</p>
<p>Generally a waste of readers&#8217; time, a space-filler, and a pseudo-page created as a place to put ads. </p>
<p>But I seriously thank you for not using it as a vehicle to push either party&#8217;s one-sided agenda. That is laudable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
